What is Planning Poker?
Planning Poker (also called Scrum Poker) is a consensus-based estimation technique used by agile software teams to estimate the effort or complexity of work items.
How It Works
Section titled “How It Works”- A moderator presents a task — typically a user story or bug
- Each team member privately selects a card representing their estimate
- All cards are revealed simultaneously — preventing anchoring bias
- The team discusses — especially when estimates diverge
- Re-vote if needed until the team reaches consensus
The simultaneous reveal is the key innovation. By hiding estimates until everyone has voted, Planning Poker prevents senior team members from anchoring the group’s thinking.
Why Use It?
Section titled “Why Use It?”| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Reduces bias | No one is influenced by seeing others’ estimates first |
| Encourages discussion | Outlier estimates spark valuable conversations about hidden complexity |
| Fast consensus | Most items converge in 1–2 rounds |
| Team engagement | Everyone participates, not just the loudest voices |
| Better accuracy | Group estimates outperform individual expert estimates over time |
Estimation Scales
Section titled “Estimation Scales”Planning Poker uses non-linear scales to reflect the increasing uncertainty of larger tasks:
- Fibonacci — 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 — the most popular scale, with gaps that grow as estimates increase
- Linear — 1 through 10 — simpler but less nuanced for large items
- T-Shirt sizes — XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL — great for rough, relative sizing
Special Cards
Section titled “Special Cards”Most decks include special cards beyond numeric values:
- ? (Question mark) — “I don’t have enough information to estimate this”
- (Coffee break) — “I need a break” (Fibonacci deck only)
When to Use Planning Poker
Section titled “When to Use Planning Poker”Planning Poker works best for:
- Sprint planning sessions
- Backlog refinement / grooming
- Estimating new features or epics
- Any scenario where the team needs shared understanding of effort
It’s less suited for:
- Trivially small items everyone agrees on
- Highly technical tasks only one person understands
- Time-boxed exercises where speed matters more than accuracy (try T-Shirt sizing instead)
Planning Poker vs. Other Techniques
Section titled “Planning Poker vs. Other Techniques”| Technique | Speed | Accuracy | Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planning Poker | Medium | High | Rich |
| T-Shirt Sizing | Fast | Low–Medium | Light |
| Dot Voting | Fast | Low | Minimal |
| Expert Estimate | Fastest | Variable | None |
| Affinity Mapping | Slow | Medium | Rich |
Planning Poker strikes the best balance between speed and accuracy for most teams.